Dysport vs Botox: Which Is The Real Deal?

Dysport is the newly approved alternative to Botox and has been hailed by many as a huge improvement. Until recently it was a newcomer to the scene, but it is a great alternative for those who have taken Botox for treating wrinkles, as well as for those with serious skin conditions.

So what is behind the Dysport-versus-Botox debate and is there any truth in it or is it just a marketing ploy by the cosmetics industry?

dysport-vs-botox-which-is-the-real-deal

The injections are made with botulinum toxin type A, which paralyzes the injected muscles. This is not permanent paralysis, but the shots must be repeated regularly until they wear out, and that is the difference between the two. Read on to learn more about the injections so you can make an informed decision.

Dysport, on the other hand, seems to last at least 6 months, which keeps him longer, but Botox has to be repeated every 3 months. The main reason why Dysport is preferred to its sister poison is that it seems to work faster.

dysport-vs-botox-which-is-the-real-deal

Although it would be best to take the faster-acting version, not everyone plans to get the injection a whole week in advance. In cases where wrinkle removal is a last minute decision, it is crucial to start with botulinum and can be crucial once the decision has been made. There would be situations where it would have been better to achieve an active result more quickly, but in these cases the difference between starting with botulinum and dysport in terms of the time between the two treatments cannot be great.

The downside of this latest type of injection is that it can stimulate the body to produce antibodies. This can lead to the poison attacking and essentially becoming unusable, which may happen with Botox, but is less likely.

At this stage, this new version of botulinum toxin is relatively new and still on the market, and studies are still being carried out. However, it is approved for human use, although it has significant side effects. In fact, the side effects of these two shots are very similar, but not in the same way as Botox.

This can be easily offset by ice on the surface, but not in the long term as it can cause side effects such as muscle spasms, headaches, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea.

One of the much discussed advantages of this new wrinkle remover is that it costs less than the old method. You need three injections of Dysport to achieve the same effect, but the price is about a third of the cost of a Botox injection. That being said, a lower dose is a better option if you want a slight paralysis of the facial muscles. Ultimately, the choice is yours when it comes to botox and it is up to you what your final decision will be.


0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

en_USEnglish
sv_SESwedish en_USEnglish